Monday, December 31, 2012

Pitcher Fatigue, Part 2: The Top 10

Earlier, I wrote a post on the declining effectiveness of starting pitchers as they get deeper into games, postulating that it came from two major sources: the first being the fact that it's difficult to throw 100 pitches in a night without your arm getting temporarily tired, and second that the second time a batter sees a pitcher, they already know what type of stuff the pitcher is throwing and so are better able to hit it.  Overall I estimated that by rotating pitchers frequently each game so that no pitcher went through the lineup more than once, a team could save about 5.6 wins each season (ignoring other effects, like the fact that if you're in the NL you get to pinch hit more often).

Also, starting with this post I'm going to make a conscious effort to switch from using OPS as my default batting stat to wOBA. wOBA, which is on the same scale as on-base percentage, is basically a version of OPS that uses more accurate weightings for events.

______________________________

On average, in 2012, the first time pitchers saw a batter they allowed a wOBA of about 0.338.  The second time they saw those batters, the wOBA jumped to about 0.350, for a difference in wOBA of about 0.011.  I'm going to name this statistic--wOBA for second plate appearances minus wOBA for fist--w-diff.

So the league average w-diff in 2012 was about 0.011.  But different pitchers had different w-diffs.

Look, for instance, at R.A. Dickey.  Dickey is a knuckleballer, and so one would expect hitters to be unusually bad the first time they see him--they have no practice hitting a knuckle-ball--but to get much better the second time, meaning one would expect him to have an unusually large w-diff.  And, in fact, he does have a large w-diff over his career if you ignore all of the seasons in which he didn't have a large w-diff, which is a thing that makes a lot of sense to do if you have a personal vendetta against the year 2011.




In fact, there is something slightly surprising about w-diff.  I calculated w-diff for all pitchers who met an innings threshold* in both 2011 and 2012.  68 pitchers met this definition, and the correlation between w-diff in 2011 and 2012 for those pitchers was 0.0508.  It seems that there is almost no correlation between w-diff for a pitcher between years (though w-diff across the league seems relatively stable: it was 0.0107 in 2011 and 0.0113 in 2012).  So while it seems like pitchers in general do better the first time they see a hitter, there don't seem to be many pitchers who consistently over or under perform the league w-diff.

For those who like graphs, here's a graph of w-diff in 2011 on the x-axis and w-diff in 2012 on the y-axis for those 68 pitchers:



So, without further ado, I present you a list that I just said is meaningless: the pitchers with the top ten w-diff scores from 2012.  Do you see any patterns in these pitchers?  I don't.  (Remember that league-average w-diff is 0.011.)



10:     Yu Darvish
          2012 w-diff: 0.083.  2011 w-diff: N/A.

9:       Rich Porcello
         2012 w-diff: 0.083.  2011 w-diff: 0.129.

8:       Ivan Nova
         2012 w-diff: 0.084.  2011 w-diff: 0.088.

7:       Bartolo Colon
         2012 w-diff: 0.089.  2011 w-diff: -0.052.

6:       C.J. Wilson
         2012 w-diff: 0.096.  2011 w-diff: 0.037.

5:       Mat Latos
         2012 w-diff: 0.101.  2011 w-diff: 0.041.

4:       Vance Worley
          2012 w-diff: 0.102.  2011 w-diff: -0.093.

3:       Joe Saunders
         2012 w-diff: 0.103.  2011 w-diff: -0.038.

2:      Jon Lester
         2012 w-diff: 0.119.  2011 w-diff: -0.043.

And, highest w-diff from the 2012 season belongs to:

1:      Tommy Hunter
         2012 w-diff: 0.170.  2011 w-diff: 0.177.

Tommy Hunter was a not very good starting pitcher for the Baltimore Orioles last season; his ERA was 5.45.  But Tommy Hunter was an especially not very good starting pitcher the second time he saw a batter.  I ran a basim simulation on his 2012 statistics the first and second times he saw batters.  Basim predicted that the first time through the lineup, he would have a 3.06 ERA; the second time through his ERA would be 7.65.  I guess the moral of the story is: friends don't let Tommy Hunter pitch past the second inning.



_________________________________________________________________________________
* technically, the (arbitrary) threshold that used was that they had to face at least 150 batters at lest twice in a game during the season, which is roughly equivalent to making at least 17 starts.

1 comment: